Legal Opinion
Eustace v. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1935No. 7889PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order adjudging Katie M. Eustace and Charles W. Fourl guilty of contempt of court and fining each of them $1,000. In the statement of facts which follows we will not undertake for the moment to distinguish between facts which appellants offered to prove and those which otherwise appeared in the record:
John M. Eustace was engaged in the plumbing business at three separate places under the fictitious name of Eustace Plumbing Company. This name had been filed with the county clerk after due notice, as required by law, and the information therein…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,322 Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., William H. HowtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Nat Yanish v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Albert B. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.