Legal Opinion
Oriel v. Russell
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 14, 1929No. 92 and 91PublishedCited by 240 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
These are writs of certiorari to orders of commitment of bankrupts for contempt, one in No. 92 of Harry Oriel and Joseph Confino, and the other in No. 91. of Samuel Prela, made by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and affirmed by. the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second'Circuit. They were heard together.
In the. Oriel case, the order, the breach of which led to the commitment, was against Oriel and Confino, directing them to turn over to their trustee in bankruptcy their books for the year 1925. The turnover order was made upon the report of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Lalone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by240 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.