Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Amtrak

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-CV-6076PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Today we resolve a series of motions filed by both Plaintiff, Patricia O’Brien, and Defendants, Amtrak and the New Jersey Transit Authority. Plaintiffs lawsuit alleges that unhealthy conditions at her workplace, the Amtrak Ticket Office within the Trenton Train Station, caused her serious medical problems. Some of these unhealthy conditions included rodent infestation, pesticide spraying during working hours, poor ventilation and air quality and general filth and uncleanliness.

Defendants’ Motion asks this Court to reconsider our July 24, 1995 Order denying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Hall v. Clifton PrecisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Frazier v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Christy v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Johnson v. Wayne Manor ApartmentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. STATE EX. REL. MEANS v. KingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Plaisted v. Geisinger Medical CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Brincko v. Rio Properties, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  4. Pescia v. Auburn Ford-Lincoln Mercury Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  5. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp. v. CuraScript Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API