Legal Opinion
Christy v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 31, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 93-3346PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Today we resolve Plaintiffs Motion for a Protective Order. This is the most recent discovery dispute in a case that has already spawned more than ten discovery rulings, usually requests for Protective Orders. Christy requests (1) that defendants be prohibited from taking his deposition for a second time, (2) defendants be prohibited from giving instructions to witnesses prior to depositions and (3) an order compelling witnesses’ attendance at depositions.
1. CHRISTY’S SECOND DEPOSITION
Christy was deposed by defendants on November 8,1993. In mid-1994 he filed a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hall v. Clifton PrecisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Delco Wire & Cable, Inc. v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Perry v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
- Tramm v. Porter Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- Deines v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bonnie & Co. Fashions, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Bonnie & Co. Fashions, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Williams ex rel. Williams v. GreenleeDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Odone v. Croda International PLC.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.