Parsons v. Parsons
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This is an appeal by Horace Mann Insurance Company from a summary judgment entered February 25, 1987, in favor of respondent, Sara J. Parsons. The trial court declared that two policies issued by appel lant to the insured provided concurrent non-owned vehicle liability coverage for a total available coverage of $600,000.00. Appellant contends that the coverage was stacked contrary to Minnesota law. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, a party defendant, concurs with appellant’s argument. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 20, 1984, respondent was a passenger in a 1978 Ford Fiesta…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- L & H TRANSP., INC. v. Drew Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Eakman v. BrutgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. EkerothColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Group Health, Inc. v. HeuerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. BollmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991