Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Parsons

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 6, 1987No. C5-87-924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This is an appeal by Horace Mann Insurance Company from a summary judgment entered February 25, 1987, in favor of respondent, Sara J. Parsons. The trial court declared that two policies issued by appel lant to the insured provided concurrent non-owned vehicle liability coverage for a total available coverage of $600,000.00. Appellant contends that the coverage was stacked contrary to Minnesota law. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, a party defendant, concurs with appellant’s argument. We affirm.

FACTS

On July 20, 1984, respondent was a passenger in a 1978 Ford Fiesta…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. L & H TRANSP., INC. v. Drew Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Eakman v. BrutgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. EkerothColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Group Health, Inc. v. HeuerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. BollmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API