Rodgers v. Roseville Gold Dredging Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from the judgment in a quiet title action involving a common boundary dispute. Judgment was in favor of plaintiffs, quieting their title to the disputed area and fixing the boundary according to a survey which their evidence showed was designed to follow the line of a previously existing fence between the properties, which fence was obliterated when the property was dredged for gold.
These adjoining properties lie immediately north of the old Auburn-Saeramento Road in Placer County. It is admitted that for many years prior to 1934 the two parcels were…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Weaver v. HowattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shelton v. MaletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Mulberry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966