Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Roseville Gold Dredging Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1955No. Civ. 8620PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from the judgment in a quiet title action involving a common boundary dispute. Judgment was in favor of plaintiffs, quieting their title to the disputed area and fixing the boundary according to a survey which their evidence showed was designed to follow the line of a previously existing fence between the properties, which fence was obliterated when the property was dredged for gold.

These adjoining properties lie immediately north of the old Auburn-Saeramento Road in Placer County. It is admitted that for many years prior to 1934 the two parcels were…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Weaver v. HowattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shelton v. MaletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Mulberry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API