Legal Opinion

Mulberry v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 18, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

Paul Mulberry, tried by a jury, was fined $325 for removing a fence from a boundary line in violation of KRS 433.770(2). He represented himself until this appeal was taken. No transcript of evidence is filed with us and no motion for a new trial was made in the trial court.

His first contention is that a fence does not constitute a monument within the meaning of KRS 433.770(2). This statutory subsection provides, in part: “Any person who willfully and knowingly, but without a felonious intent, breaks down, damages or removes any monument erected to designate * * * the boundaries…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartsock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Rice v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  3. Delphey v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Perich v. MaurerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Rodgers v. Roseville Gold Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freeman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  2. Jarrett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API