Mulberry v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Judge.
Paul Mulberry, tried by a jury, was fined $325 for removing a fence from a boundary line in violation of KRS 433.770(2). He represented himself until this appeal was taken. No transcript of evidence is filed with us and no motion for a new trial was made in the trial court.
His first contention is that a fence does not constitute a monument within the meaning of KRS 433.770(2). This statutory subsection provides, in part: “Any person who willfully and knowingly, but without a felonious intent, breaks down, damages or removes any monument erected to designate * * * the boundaries…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hartsock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Rice v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Delphey v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Perich v. MaurerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Rodgers v. Roseville Gold Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- Freeman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Jarrett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968