Legal Opinion

Park v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Onondaga Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Onondaga on the 14th day of December, 1900, granting the plaintiff’s motion for a retaxation of the costs of the action.

1Opinion of the Court

The following is the opinion of Andrews, J.:

W. S. Andrews, J.:

' The clerk of Onondaga county upon the taxation of costs in the above action struck out an item of $110 paid by the plaintiff for a copy of the stenographer’s minutes. The, plaintiff had obtained these minutes for the purpose of .preparing amendments to the case and exceptions served by the defendant upon an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Term of the Supreme Court to the Appellate Division thereof, and he swears that they were necessary and requisite for that purpose for the reason that the defendant had refused to allow him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Ridabock v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Sebley v. NicholsNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Whitney v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pringle v. DeanNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Navara v. M. Witmark & SonsNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Park v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API