Whitney v. Roe
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from Chemung county court. Action by James Whitney against John C. Roe. From an order striking out an item of the bill of costs as taxed, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
This is an appeal from an order made by the Che-mung county court, striking from the bill of costs herein as taxed by the clerk the sum of $36, which was allowed for stenographer’s fees paid for the minutes of a preceding trial. The appellant insists that this item was properly taxed, for the reason that the minutes were ordered by the court to be used on the hearing of a motion for a new trial made on the minutes of the trial judge. In this case there had been a trial by jury, and a verdict rendered in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff then moved for a new trial on the minutes, on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Sebley v. NicholsNew York Supreme Court · 1866
- Hovey v. HoveyNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Stevens v. New York Elevated RailroadThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1890
- Griggs v. GuinnThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Park v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Chapman v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Park v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1900