Pringle v. Dean
New York Supreme Court
Action by one Pringle against one Dean and others. From the-judgment, plaintiff appealed. On motion, after remittitur, to strike an item of disbursements taxed in favor of defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.
[ 1 ] This is a motion to strike from the bill of costs- and disbursements taxed by Oswego county clerk in favor of the defendant and respondent above named an item of disbursement of $32" paid for copy of stenographer’s minutes, which respondents claim was necessarily obtained in order to prepare amendments to proposed case on appeal. Plaintiff appellant contends that such item was unnecessary, and therefore not taxable, for the reason that there was an understanding between the attorneys for the respective parties that the-appellant’s copy should be used by the respondents in preparing such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ridabock v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Starkweather v. SundstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Park v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hertzberg v. ElvidgeNew York Supreme Court · 1913