Legal Opinion

Navara v. M. Witmark & Sons

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtThomas A. Aurelio, J.

Motion for an order directing the plaintiff to supply the defendants with a copy of the stenographic minutes to enable them to prepare proposed amendments to plaintiff’s proposed bill of exceptions, is denied. The time of the defendants to serve proposed amendments is extended until 30 days after the date of this order, and if additional time is required, they may apply therefor to the court.

*50None of the parties has referred the court to any rule of practice or case dealing with the specific problem here involved of a direction to an appellant to serve respondents with a copy of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ridabock v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Starkweather v. SundstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Park v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Adams Laundry Machinery Co. v. PrunierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API