Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J. R.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1982No. 67090PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Paul and Connie, the natural, paternal grandparents of minors J.R. and S.R., appeal the juvenile court’s rulings that the grandparents lacked standing to intervene in proceedings to terminate the parental rights of the children’s natural parents, Curtis and Rose Ann, and that the best interests of the children required adoption by anonymous third parties, rather than by the grandparents, to assure that the natural parents never again have contact with the children.

On May 7,1981, pursuant to an emergency order, three-year-old J. R. and nine-month-old S. R. were removed from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of DameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Price v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Schimerowski v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. In the Interest of HewittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. In the Interest of GoettscheSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. In the Interest of J.c, Minor Child. D.C., FatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. In the Interest of ChadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Bechtel v. Rose in and for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Birkhofer Ex Rel. Johannsen v. BrammeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API