Legal Opinion

Bechtel v. Rose in and for Maricopa County

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1986No. CV-86-0043-SAPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice.

This special action raises novel and complex questions with regard to grandparents’ rights in the disposition of their parentless grandchildren. The particular issues that we must address are: did the juvenile court commit reversible error by denying the grandmother’s motion to intervene in her grandchild’s dependency hearing; and by denying the grandmother’s petition for appointment as her grandchild’s guardian and conservator?

The factual background giving rise to this case is not in dispute. The infant around whom swirls this controversy was born in March, 1985.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Nancy Anne Spangler, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re the Appeal in Cochise County Juvenile Action No. 5666-JArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Anonymous v. AnonymousCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Dowling v. StapleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Baker v. WebbKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Winner Enterprises, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. In Re Interest of Kayle C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API