Legal Opinion

Globe Electric Co. v. Montgomery

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1915No. 12442PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Prater, J., entered May 23, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in garnishment proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is an appeal by the garnishee defendants from a judgment rendered against them.

The facts, briefly stated, are as follows: From the month of December, 1911, until the month of June, 1913, the principal defendants, under the name of the Edison Electric Company, were engaged in the business of selling electric light fixtures and electric supplies. During this time the Edison Electric Company had become indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $909.67. It had also become indebted to the garnishee defendants upon an open account in the sum of approximately $510.97. This debt to the garnishee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Lehn v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hallam v. TillinghastWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dittenhœfer v. Cœur d'Alene Clothing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Peterson v. DoakWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luges v. WindellWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Daniels v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API