Dittenhœfer v. Cœur d'Alene Clothing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. Action by Dittenhoefer, Hass & Co. against the Coeur d’Alene Clothing Company, principal defendant, and the St. Paul German Insurance Company and the Hekla Fire Insurance Company, garnishee defendants. Judgment for plaintiffs, and the garnishees appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J. —
The mere fact that the transcript was two days late in reaching the clerk of this court should not, in our judgment, work a dismissal of the appeal. Nor does there seem to have been any necessity for giving the original judgment defendant notice of the appeal. It was not a party to the garnishment order, decree or judgment, and was not mentioned in it, except by incidental reference. And the like remark is true of the North Pacific Insurance Company. Each garnishee stands alone, and is not interested in orders made against others.
*521In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roche v. Rhode Island InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
- Clark v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
3Cited by7 opinions
- Luges v. WindellWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Neufelder v. German American InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Olympia Mining & Milling Co. v. KernsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Gilmore & Ruhl v. CohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Globe Electric Co. v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.