Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1915No. 12254PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Pemberton, J., entered June 2,1914, upon agreed facts in favor of the garnishee defendant, dismissing garnishment proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

An action was commenced by plaintiff, F. E. Daniels, -as assignee of Ferdinand Westheimer & Sons, a Missouri corporation, against Pat Milan and H. Dillon, to recover the purchase price of liquors sold between January 1, and October 2, 1908. In November, 1908, judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor, upon which garnishment proceedings were instituted forthwith against the Pacific Brewing & Malting Company, a corporation, as garnishee defendant. From a judgment in the garnishee’s favor, the plaintiff has appealed.

*417The facts, which are stipulated, in substance show, that, on or about November…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Turner v. Iowa National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Vietor v. GloverWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Zent v. GilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Peterson v. DoakWashington Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Englewood State Bank v. TegtmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Slow v. Ohio Valley Roofing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Talty v. SchoenholzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  5. Winters National Bank & Tr Co. v. Midland Acceptance Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API