Luges v. Windell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Blake, J., entered June 26,1920, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff in an action in garnishment proceedings.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
Luger recovered judgments against Windell on account of damages arising from an auto*376mobile accident. These judgments were affirmed by this court in Luger v. Windell, 110 Wash. 22, 187 Pac. 407. After the remittiturs had gone down, a writ of garnishment was served on the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, under the claim that it was indebted to, or had property of, Windell in its possession, which should be made to satisfy the judgments. The casualty company answered, denying any indebtedness; Luger controverted the answer by alleging that the casualty company had issued a policy of insurance…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Sanders v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Davies v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kuntz v. SpenceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
- Quinlan v. Liberty Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Combs v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
- Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.