United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER
ANDERSEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), brings a motion for partial summary judgment and defendant, General Motors Corporation (GM), brings a cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the following reasons, EEOC’s motion is granted and GM’s motion is denied.
FACTS
The facts are undisputed. Since 1941, GM has had an “open door” policy, an informal dispute resolution procedure, through which salaried employees 1 may seek investigation and resolution of employment-related problems.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Jillian's of Indianapolis, IN, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Massachusetts v. Bull HN Information Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Nichols v. Illinois Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.