Zavelo v. Reeves
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. The facts, which involve the validity of an express promise by the bankrupt to pay a provable debt made after the petition and before the discharge, are stated in the opinion.,
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
Defendants in. error sued plaintiff in error November 22, 1907, in the City Court of Birmingham, Alabama, declaring upon the common counts for moneys due December 10, 1906, and February 19, 1906, and by an amendment declared upon a promissory note for about $250 which was a part of a claim of the defendants in error that antedated the bankruptcy of the plaintiff in error. The defendant (now plaintiff in error) pleaded that.on November 22, 1905, he filed in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama, his petition in bankruptcy; that said court had jurisdiction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clarke v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Colman Co. v. WithoftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Rector v. City Deposit Bank Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Knapp v. HoytSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.