Lubin v. Cowell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This action was instituted by Adeline Lubin Goldstein, as general guardian of Daniel Lubin, a minor, against Hollis D. Cowell, doing business as Babcock Motors, for the purpose of obtaining the return of the purchase price of a Packard sedan automobile, claimed to have been paid by Daniel Lubin to Babcock Motors.
The right to the return of the purchase price of the automobile is based upon the allegations that, at the time of the pin-ported sale, Daniel Lubin was a minor of the age of twenty years; that, prior to the institution of this action, the minor, in writing, disaffirmed the contract…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Snodderly v. BrothertonWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Gill v. ParryWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Stone v. KnutzenWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Thosath v. Transport Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Shermer v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Payless Car Rental System, Inc. v. DraayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Drake v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.