Legal Opinion

In re A.K.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 2006No. 2176 MDA 2005; No. 7 MDA 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 In these appeals, C.P.K. (Father) and C.C. (Mother) challenge the order of the trial court changing the goal for their twin daughters, A.K. and L.K., born February 4, 2004, from reunification to adoption. We reverse.

¶2 The pertinent facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows: On June 4, 2004, A.K. and L.K., who were both bom premature, were placed on an emergency basis with the Cumberland County Children and Youth Services (the Agency) because of suspected physical abuse. Over the months that followed, several hearings were conducted before the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of C.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. In re B.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. In Re AKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. In re C.V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re S.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. In the Interest of D.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. In re A.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. In re K.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. In the Interest of R.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API