Legal Opinion

In re A.K.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, C.P.K. (“Father”), appeals from the trial court’s orders changing the placement goal for his dependent twin daughters to adoption.1 Father asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in granting the placement goal change when Father, although incarcerated, had made substantial progress toward his permanency plan goals and had an emotional bond with his children. Following careful review, we affirm.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history of the instant case have previously been summarized by this Court as follows:

On June 4, 2004, A.K. and L.K., who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re N.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. In the Interest of C.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. In re A.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In Re AKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In the Interest of R.J.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. In Re Adoption of G.R.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. In the Interest of H.V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In Re: Adoption of S.B.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API