Legal Opinion

In the Interest of R.P.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 KP. (“Mother”) and J.P. (“Father”) (also collectively referred to as “Parents”) appeal from the orders dated October 31, 2007, which were filed November 1, 2007, changing the placement goal for their children, R.P. and L.P., to adoption. As these appeals involve identical parties and derive from the same permanency hearing determinations and orders, we have elected to *451discuss them together.1 Following our complete and thorough review of the record, we affirm.

¶ 2 Eighteen-month-old R.P. arrived at the Bon Secours Community Hospital Emergency Room on August 26, 2007,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. In the Interest of LilleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Cady v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. In re R.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burns v. Department of Human ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Sandin v. Dempsey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API