Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.P.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

¶ 1 In these consolidated appeals, Appellant, A.M. (“Mother”), appeals from the *1222dispositional order in dependency proceedings which changed the permanency goal for Mother’s three male children, D.P. (D.O.B. 2/2/94), D.M. (D.O.B. 12/23/95), and J.M. (D.O.B. 3/9/98) (collectively, “Children”). The Children were previously adjudicated dependent pursuant to the Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6301 et seq. In the order on appeal, the trial court changed the goal for the family from reunification to adoption, and ordered a concurrent permanency goal of “placement in another…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.L.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. In re D.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Cady v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. In Interest of Theresa E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. In Re Adoption of S.E.G.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R.J.T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. In re R.I.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. In the Interest of R.J.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. In re Adoption of S.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. In re R.M.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API