Legal Opinion

Drakes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 30, 1993No. 92-774CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case, before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, calls into question the nature of the Government’s obligation to protect informants. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

FACTS

Darren Drakes (“plaintiff”) was arrested on March 8, 1990, for alleged distribution of heroin. He waived extradition from Ma*191ryland to the District of Columbia. The Government’s Motion for Preventive Detention was heard and granted on March 14, 1990. A Motion for Revocation of Detention Order filed by plaintiff on March 30, 1990,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. James H. Sanders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Phang v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API