Legal Opinion

Waage v. Borer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 12, 1994No. 93-3010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In Watts v. Watts, 137 Wis. 2d 506, 532-33, 405 N.W.2d 303, 314 (1987), our supreme court recognized actions in unjust enrichment by unmarried cohabitants following the termination of their relationships, for recovery of their share of wealth, accumulated through their joint efforts and retained by one of the parties in an unreasonable amount.

In this case, Dale E. Bower and Donald Waage were nonmarital cohabitants for about eight years. Bower claimed money for her housekeeping efforts during that period of time, after Waage reneged on an alleged promise to marry her. A jury found that Waage…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Corroon & Black-Rutters & Roberts, Inc. v. HoschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Brown v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Watts (Bischoff) v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stan's Lumber, Inc. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  2. Halverson v. River Falls Youth Hockey Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Tri-State Mechanical, Inc. v. Northland CollegeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. Ulrich v. ZemkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Debra K. Sands v. John R. Menard, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API