Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Zemke

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 19, 2002No. 01-2195PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

¶ 1. Susan Ulrich appeals the judgment which resulted from an action for unjust enrichment dividing Ulrich and Glenn Zemke's real and personal property. Ulrich argues that the court applied an improper standard of law to her claim to a parcel of real estate located on Badger Road in Adams County (Badger). Ulrich also argues that the circuit court made erroneous findings of fact regarding the value of the parties' real estate and credits to be afforded to each party and that the circuit court calculated the equaliza tion payment incorrectly. Because we agree that the circuit court applied an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Three & One Co. v. GeilfussCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  4. Waage v. BorerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buckett v. JanteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  2. Tri-State Mechanical, Inc. v. Northland CollegeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  3. Ludyjan v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  4. Abbott v. MarkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  5. Debra K. Sands v. John R. Menard, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API