Legal Opinion

Rammell v. Idaho State Department of Agriculture

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2009No. 34927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Rex and Lynda Rammell appeal from a final order issued by the Department of Agriculture (the Department) imposing $29,000.00 in fines against them for nine violations of a statute and regulations pertaining to domestic cervidae. We affirm the order in part, and vacate in part.

I

Dr. Rex Rammell, a licensed Idaho veterinarian, and his wife, Lynda Rammell, operated a domestic cervidae ranch doing business as Elk Country Trophy Bulls. In December 2003, an inspector with the Department contacted Dr. Rammell intending to schedule an annual elk inventory of the Rammells’ herd. Dr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lamar Corp. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lake CDA Investment, LLC v. Idaho Department of LandsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Smith v. Washington County IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Pioneer Irrigation District v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Sopatyk v. Lemhi CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Kootenai Hospital District v. Bonner County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API