Legal Opinion

United States v. Chan

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 14, 2002No. S11 97 CR 1053(PKL)PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge.

The government charges the defendant Alexander Chan with five counts involving narcotics related offenses, one count of which charges Chan with a conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin. The government moves, in limine, to introduce portions of the guilty plea allocutions of three of the defendant’s alleged co-conspirators, Kin Man Hui, Gerry Eng, and Ting To Kaw, in order to prove the existence of a conspiracy, arguing that these redacted allocutions are statements against interest under Rule 804(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and thus…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Command Cinema Corp. v. VCA Labs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  3. United States v. PughDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  4. City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. New America Marketing FSI LLC v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API