Legal Opinion

Eustice v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1994No. 93-176PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Chief Justice.

Appellant Michael Thomas Eustiee appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate or correct an illegal sentence.

We reverse and remand.

Appellant raises the following issues:

I. Whether the trial court erred and abused its discretion, and violated appellant’s right to due process, when it sentenced appellant to terms of incarceration of from one year and 114 days to three years and 114 days on charges of misdemeanor battery.

II. Whether the trial court erred and abused its discretion when it failed to grant appellant credit against his sentences for all…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rivera v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Betzle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Carey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Candelaria v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. YellowBear v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wayt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mullins v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Milladge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API