Legal Opinion

White v. Sargent

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 2005No. 03-PR-1017, 04-PR-553PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

In these consolidated appeals, appellants Eva White and Evelyn Parchment challenge the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of appellee Lucy Sargent. The trial court held that the trust created by her late husband, Ernest Sargent, was null and void because it was created for the fraudulent purpose of concealing assets and because it resulted in an improper circumvention of Mrs. Sargent’s marital rights. We agree with the trial court’s ruling and the reasons behind it, and accordingly we affirm the judgment.

I

Ernest and Lucy Sargent married each other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Teru Chang v. Institute for Public-Private Partnerships, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Wyman v. RoesnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. In Re Estate of DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nuyen v. LunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Karsenty v. SchoukrounCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. In re Estate of ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. In re Estate of ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  5. New Media Strategies, Inc. v. Pulpfree, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API