Goff v. FRANK A. WARD REALTY & INSURANCE CO., INC.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Plaintiffs assign as error the allowance of defendants’ motions for directed verdict. We hold that the trial court did not err in allowing the motion.
Evidence introduced by plaintiffs tended to show:
On or about 12 June 1968, defendants Poche purchased Lot No. 18 of Block C Extension of Westglen Subdivision, Section 3, in Durham County, and moved into the recently constructed house thereon. Said lot is located on the western side of Pinafore Drive and west of the lot are adjoining lots which front Cromwell Drive to their west. A Strauss family occupied the house on the lot…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Brooks v. Ervin Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Cash Register Co. v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Childress v. NordmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- RD&J Properties v. Lauralea-Dilton Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Johnson v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Deans v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Clouse v. GordonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Marshall v. KeavenyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.