Legal Opinion

Gold v. Alamo Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 1, 1981No. 8642PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

Plaintiff below appeals from an adverse judgment, based upon a jury verdict, in her suit to recover statutory penalties for usury pursuant to Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-1.06 (1971). She alleged that defendant charged her $27,124.70 more interest than was authorized by law. Her theory of recovery was that defendant required her to assume her son’s debt as an express condition of the defendant acquiring and extending the time of payment of her note then held by a bank.

The facts, while somewhat involved, essentially are undisputed. Plaintiff is a widow living in San Antonio…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bank of the United States v. Waggener and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. First State Bank of Bedford v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cain v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Moore v. Sabine National Bank of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alamo Lumber Co. v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Moody v. Main Bank of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  3. Alamo Lumber Co. v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API