Legal Opinion

Moody v. Main Bank of Houston

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 1, 1984No. 01-82-0505-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

Appellant, Shearn Moody, Jr., appeals from a take nothing judgment based upon a jury verdict in his suit against appellee, Main Bank of Houston, to recover statutory penalties for usury arising out of a contractual clearing house and loan arrangement between the appellee bank and a Galveston bank owned by Moody.

It is undisputed that Main Bank required Moody to guarantee payment of a $116,000 judgment Main Bank had obtained against a third party as a condition of Main’s continuing its clearinghouse and lending relationship with Moody’s bank. Moody relies on two theories…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Preston Farm & Ranch Supply, Inc. v. Bio-Zyme EnterprisesTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stedman v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. First State Bank of Bedford v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cook v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Dunnam v. Burns, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  5. Moore v. Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaboonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API