Legal Opinion

Alamo Lumber Co. v. Gold

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1983No. C-883Published

1Opinion of the Court

661 S.W.2d 926 (1983)

ALAMO LUMBER COMPANY, Petitioner,

v.

Addie B. GOLD, Respondent.

No. C-883.

Supreme Court of Texas.

November 2, 1983.

Rehearing Denied January 11, 1984.

Foster, Lewis, Langley, Gardner & Banack, Ralph Langley and Emerson Banack, Jr., San Antonio, Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody, Robert J. Hearon, Jr. and Thomas I. Davies, Austin, for petitioner.

West & West, Dennis K. Drake, San Antonio, for respondent.

POPE, Chief Justice.

The question presented is whether Alamo Lumber Company charged usury to Mrs. Addie Gold when Alamo purchased Gold's delinquent note for $75,000 plus interest…

Also in this document: Dissent · Barrow; Dissent · Barrow.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Walker v. Temple Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Smart v. Tower Land & Investment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Stedman v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Leonard v. Texaco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. First State Bank of Bedford v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API