State v. Stenger
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold that (1) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Angela Stenger (Petitioner) was entitled to a mistake of fact instruction under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 702-218 (1993)1; (2) based on that holding, it would be inappropriate for the circuit court of the first circuit (the court)2 to also give a claim of right instruction pursuant to HRS § 708-834(1) (Supp.2002)3; (3) under the circumstances of this ease, first-degree theft by deception under HRS §§ 708-830(2) and 708-830.5(l)(a) (1993)4 is a continuing of*274fense, and thus, the court was right in rejecting…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. NicholsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HaanioHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. KikutaHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CabagbagHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Schnabel.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- Flores v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Taylor.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.