Legal Opinion

State v. Stenger

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2010No. 27511PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that (1) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Angela Stenger (Petitioner) was entitled to a mistake of fact instruction under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 702-218 (1993)1; (2) based on that holding, it would be inappropriate for the circuit court of the first circuit (the court)2 to also give a claim of right instruction pursuant to HRS § 708-834(1) (Supp.2002)3; (3) under the circumstances of this ease, first-degree theft by deception under HRS §§ 708-830(2) and 708-830.5(l)(a) (1993)4 is a continuing of*274fense, and thus, the court was right in rejecting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. NicholsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. HaanioHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. KikutaHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. CabagbagHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. Schnabel.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Flores v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. Taylor.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API