Legal Opinion

State v. Schnabel.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2012No. SCWC-29390PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold first, that, Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 571-84(h) clearly and unambiguously prohibits the use of evidence from juvenile proceedings in any adult criminal case for any purpose whatsoever. Accordingly, the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) gravely erred in affirming the ruling of the circuit court of the first circuit (the court), that Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawai'i (Respondent) would be allowed to introduce evidence from the prior juvenile proceedings of Petitioner/Defen-danF-Appellant Less Allen Schnabel, Jr. (Petitioner), if…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. County of Hawaii v. UNIDEV, LLC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Chong Hung HanHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. Basham.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Metcalfe.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Cox v. Cox.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API