Legal Opinion
GETTY OIL COMPANY (EASTERN OPERATIONS) v. Ruckelshaus
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 10, 1972No. Civ. A. 4366PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, District Judge.
This action seeks (1) preliminary and permanent orders staying the effect of a compliance date set forth in a compliance order issued by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (the “Administrator”) pursuant to Section 113 of the federal Clean Air Act as amended by the Air Quality Act of 1967 and the Clean Air Act amendments of 1970 (42 U.S.C. § 1857 et seq.) (“the Clean Air Act”) and (2) a declaratory judgment that this compliance order is null and void. The case is currently before me on plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Getty Oil Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Juanita Bay Valley Community Ass'n v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Duquesne Light Company v. Environmental Protection Agency. St. Joe Minerals Corporation v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Smith v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.