Legal Opinion
Duquesne Light Company v. Environmental Protection Agency. St. Joe Minerals Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 5, 1973No. 72-1542, 72-1543PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION SUR RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
Resolution of the motion presently'before the Court 1 requires that we address difficult procedural problems arising from the recently enacted programs for the abatement of air pollution.
Duquesne Light Company (Duquesne), Pennsylvania Power Co. and Ohio Edison Co. are engaged in Western Pennsylvania in the generation of electric power by burning coal. St. Joe Minerals Corp. (St. Joe) produces electricity and zinc, also using coal as the fuel. Pursuant to the new clean air programs, Pennsylvania enacted a series of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- International Harvester Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Getty Oil Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Raheem Jacobs v. Cumberland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- The Anaconda Company, a Montana Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.