Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 10, 2001No. AC 20410PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant, Francis R. Dixon, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sale of a controlled substance in violation General Statutes § 21a-278 (b)1 and sale of a controlled substance within 1500 feet of a school in violation of *645General Statutes § 21a-278a (b).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) marshaled the evidence in favor of the state in its jury instruction, thereby violating his due process right to a fair trial, and (2) failed to give a curative instruction regarding the hearsay statements of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. State v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. GrenierConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. State v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. RomanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. BardlivingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API