Legal Opinion
Whitney v. Hazard Lead Works
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 28, 1927PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The commissioner held that the plaintiff-claimant’s injury arose in the course of, but did not arise out of, her employment, and accordingly dismissed the claim. The plaintiff appealed, assigning as one of the errors of the commissioner his holding that her injury did not arise out of her employment. The defendants did not attempt to have the commissioner’s holding that the plaintiff’s injury arose in the course of her employment reviewed. The Superior Court sustained the appeal of the plaintiff and held that the commissioner erred in holding that the plaintiff’s injury did not arise out of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Marchiatello v. Lynch Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Lake v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Harivel v. Hall-Thompson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- McCulloch v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Jensen v. Manning & Brown, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Flanagan v. Webster & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.