Legal Opinion
Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 1, 1936PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of an apartment house on North Main Street in Waterbury which was assessed upon the list of 1934 as follows: land, $15,000, apartment building, $45,600, garage, $800, total, $61,400. The plaintiff, claiming this assessment to be excessive, brought this action under General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1933, § 328b (now Cum. Sup. 1935, § 375c), which provides that “when it shall be claimed . . . that a tax laid on property was computed on an assessment which, under all the circumstances, was manifestly excessive and could not have been arrived at except by disregarding the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Somers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Appeal of Cohen From Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Ford v. H. W. Dubiskie & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Whitney v. Hazard Lead WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Eichman v. J & J Building Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Sibley v. Town of MiddlefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Brown v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.