Legal Opinion
Brooks v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 30, 2002No. 2:01-cv-71921PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND/FACTS
Plaintiff Kim E. Brooks filed the instant suit against Defendants General Motors Corporation (“GM”), Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) and Titan Insurance Company before the Wayne County Circuit Court claiming: 1) breach of contract against GM and MetLife for failing to provide disability insurance based on Defendant GM’s employee benefit program; 2) breach of contract against Titan Insurance Company based on an automobile insurance policy; and 3) declaratory relief against all three Defendants. Defendants GM…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bennett v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
- McCann v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Hill v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Norris v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004