Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. PKT, INC.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2001No. Docket 114039, 115322PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

i. introduction

In these consolidated premises liability cases, plaintiffs seek to recover for injuries they suffered when fellow concertgoers at the Pine Knob Music Theater (Pine Knob), an outdoor amphitheater that offered seating on a grass-covered hill, began pulling .up and throwing pieces of sod. We granted leave to address the duty of premises owners concerning the criminal acts of third parties.

Under Mason v Royal Dequindre, Inc, 455 Mich 391; 566 NW2d 199 (1997), merchants have a duty to respond reasonably to situations occurring on the premises that pose a risk of imminent and foresee*326a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hamed v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance v. SeilsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Bailey v. SchaafMichigan Supreme Court · 2013

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API