Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Philbrick

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 12, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

An action of assumpsit on the written promise of the defendant to pay plaintiffs three thousand dollars on the foreL closure of a real estate mortgage. Plea, general issue; brief statement sets up no consideration. Directed verdict for defendant. Case forward on bill of exceptions. Exception overruled.

The mortgagor, Mr. Horace W. Patten, a Limestone man, died in 1925. Two of the plaintiffs, children of the decedent, him-surviving, are his heirs at law. One of these plaintiffs is an infant. Minority and the consequent right to avoid, which the brief for the defendant calls to attention, may…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Horvath v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Estate of Michael Lewis v. Concord General Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Reed Paper Co. v. Procter & Gamble Distributing Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1992
  5. Whitten v. Greeley-ShawSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API