Legal Opinion
Reed Paper Co. v. Procter & Gamble Distributing Co.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 4, 1992No. Civ. 91-272-P-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT PROCTER & GAMBLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.
This is an action for wrongful termination brought by Reed Paper Company (“Reed”), a former distributor of Procter & Gamble Distributing Company’s (“P & G”) Attends adult incontinence products. The first five counts of the Complaint are based in common law: Count I, misrepresentation; Count II, breach of contract; Count III, promissory estoppel; Count IV, breach of duty of good faith; and Count V, breach of duty to provide reasonable advance notice of termination. Count VI alleges a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Murphy v. Franklin Pierce Law CenterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Lowden v. William M. Mercer, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- People's Heritage Savings Bank v. Recoll Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.