Legal Opinion

Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Kieffer Bros. Investment & Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 19, 1969No. 41361PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying the motion of petitioner, Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Paul, for a new trial in a proceeding initiated by the Authority to condemn real estate of Kieffer Brothers Investment and Construction Company for inclusion in an urban renewal project. The commissioners appointed by the court placed a gross valuation of $375,000 upon the property. In appeals from the commissioners’ award, the Authority alleged that the fair market value of the property was $236,000 and the owners contended that its fair market…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Woyak v. KonieskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Berg v. UllevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. State v. SchobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SandbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. Weber-Connelly, Naegele, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Benson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API