Legal Opinion

Sulunias v. Poolos

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1918No. 988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. May 2, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

Sulunias executed a negotiable promissory note payable to the order of Poolos, -who lost the note without having indorsed it, and ■ after maturity brought suit against the maker to recover the sum due thereon. Sulunias filed an equitable petition seeking to restrain the progress of the suit, unless indemnified by bond or otherwise against a possible demand which might be made against him by some third person-holding the note. The’court refused the injunction, and the plaintiff excepted. Reid:

1. Such a note as described above stands on the basis of a non-negotiable instrument, until properly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Benson v. Abbott, Parker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Burch v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Dorris v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Island Pond National Bank v. LacroixSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Anderson Banking Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Trust Co. v. FinsterwaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Bainbridge Farm Co. v. BowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API