Legal Opinion

Bainbridge Farm Co. v. Bower

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1942No. 13992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

Although, in a suit to enforce payment or satisfaction of a lost note, bond, or other negotiable security, the court will require suitable and adequate indemnity as a condition to such relief, in the absence of a showing that it has not been indorsed (Code, § 37-214; Ross v. Wright, 12 Ga. 507, 508), yet no indemnity will be required either where the instrument is nonnegotiable, or where, even if negotiable, it “has not been duly indorsed,” since such an unindorsed and unassigned obligation “ stands on the basis of a non-negotiable instrument.” Sulunias v. Poolos, 148 Ga. 409…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Fulgham v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Newton Manufacturing Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Osborn v. Ordinary of Harris County ex rel. HueySupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  5. Ross & Co. v. WeightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myers v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API