Legal Opinion

Dorris v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Patterson. Milton superior court. August %%, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. Where the payee of a promissory note sells and delivers it to a bank before maturity, but omits to enter a written indorsement on the note or to make other written assignment thereof, legal title to the note will remain in the payee; and if, without obtaining • any written transfer, the bank institutes suit on’the note, the makers, notwithstanding the equitable title to the note may be in the bank, may set up any equities in their favor arising out of the transaction upon which the note was given. Benson v. Abbott, 95 Ga. 69 (22 S. E. 127).(a) Eailure of consideration of the note would be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benson v. Abbott, Parker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brice v. National Bondholders Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Dorris v. Farmers & Merchants BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Edwards v. CampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Sulunias v. PoolosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API